issue number 11 is now on line to read free – this issue has two fantastic articles – Colin Taylor Part two of his wonderful 3-part essay on contemporary landscape and how to translate that popular genre into a vital and important work of art…part two discusses “what is seeing.” – The second article is about why the Transavantgarde, movement that started in 1979, is still a relevant way to think about Art today and the choices a painter makes during the creative process. SPIKE & Friends – our old critically minded journalists, returns from their travels and talks to TUBES about space for painting exhibitions, or rather, the lack of it. And of course not forgetting about the brilliant 11 artists taking part in the first new Tubes Artists Gallery – A space thats just for painters.
A while ago I strayed across an interesting old video on You Tube that got me thinking about the relationship between Artistic freedom and Modern Religious Art. This particular discussion, come lecture, was presented by a line up of tenured academics and young post graduate teachers. The panel argued how Contemporary Art institutions reacted negatively to work that was based in some sort of religious subject.The discussion started after an initial lecture by one of the Academics, David Thyrell. So began two hours of surprising statements, amusing quotes, some fairly logical reasoning, heart felt speeches and many contradictions from an art academic viewpoint.
Thyrell reckoned that… “Only Art that is critical of (western) religion of faith is acceptable as Contemporary Art. And all other art that could be read as religious, is translated to one of a post minimalistic view.” (And he went on to say)…”that all references to faith and religion is edited out at source”. (And also that…)…”the contemporary Art world does not seek any debate on this form of art because they see it as non-progressive, as propagandistic and not supportive of an advancing culture or indeed, enlightening mankind for the new centuries ahead of us.”
Thyrell spoke with passion and summed up his lecture by stating:-
…”it seems, that religious work that is non-specific, for example, non-stated religious, ambiguous or totally abstracted with very loose associations, are acceptable as Contemporary Art. Providing the images are not from a Judeo Christian slant. However, the tribal, the Asiatic or the cultism subjects are OK.“
Judaeo-Christian made up the bulk of the audience (note: it was held at a Roman Catholic University) I guessed they must have been appalled by the status-quo of the implied bigotry against religious art levelled against the ‘Artists of Faith’ as they call themselves. For me personally, there is no need to be religious specific to appreciate (or create) Art that is good, even if that Art owns its very existence to institutions of any religion persuasion who sponsored it, or indeed created by an artist that holds a particular belief system or faith.
Good Art is what floats my boat, I don’t care who or why or for whom it was created for. As for the rest of the Art that floods the web and the mass media art reviews, much of that, I find sort of shallow, or egoistically based, or trendy or with sought after intellectual inveigle high street gallery intention. I simply pass quickly by, metaphorically speaking, without so much as a cursory thought. So for me to be anguished by an Art as the above, would only go to validate it as important to a sort of global cultural or spiritual advancement, which I personally, believe it is not, perhaps it’s has the absolutely reverse effect.
Most artists, (those I know personally), when looking at a work of art and those that could be deemed as ‘Religious’ minded, tend to ignore the intended propaganda or dogma that is implied in the painting, but rather they are far more concerned about the pure magic of the work in front of them.
For example some the work of Pontormo or El Greco, to mention only two (religious sponsored) painters of the distant past, whose work I personally very much admire and gain a feeling of wonder and inspiration from.
After a while I began to feel that the lecture, come debate, was slightly myopic….
The full article will be published in issue #11 of painters Tubes magazine, December 2018
painters Tubes printed magazines are available to read at the Manchester Central Library, Manchester UK. Note: limited availability per issue. Enquires for supply of Tubes magazine for public venues welcomed: email: firstname.lastname@example.org
“artists of the revolution”
full feature of how artists reflected the industrial revolution art from 1900 to today.
Publishing release date 30th July – not to be missed. Free to read on line. Printed edition available by reserving you ‘summer special printed edition – Only £8 + post and packing per magazine.
Subscribe to painters Tubes magazine – 3 months or 6 months or 12 months at £7.00 plus post and packing per issue through 2018
Featured in the upcoming issue #8 of painters Tubes magazine, will be Ian Mood, a painter who is creating a unique series of work based on his Grand fathers paintings of Stoke-on-Trent. It’s an idea that emerged slowly over time and Ian has now established a project studio in the Stoke City Centre, to make the idea a reality. During our Editor’s visit, Ian introduced him to the trustee’s of Burslem School of Art, http://www.burslemschoolofart.com/, that also have a fascinating story to tell.
Ian’s series of work – “common ground.” – will be exhibited in School’s fabulous building and exhibition space. Tubes issue #8 will be discussing the project and taking a general look at Ian’s work over the last years, which includes some unique semi-abstract (expressionist) paintings dealing with the human form and also his earlier landscape paintings…Tubes issue#8, will be publishing end of April….not to be missed.
Registered readers will be posted (by email) the access code for the Free -on-Line preview version of Tubes on: 29th October 2017
If you have not already registered please email email@example.com before or up to the 27th October. Please put ‘register me’ in the subject line of the email.
Note: Full Public release will be on the 7th November 2017.
If you wish a printed copy please ‘reserve’ by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org and put ‘Reserve a printed copy’ in the subject line. £10 inc: p&p – (£8 + £2 posting cost UK Only- for outside UK please request cost stating country of residence).
Note: Payment will only be required ‘after’ you have recieved the magazine via PayPal invoice.
Note: :participating artists will be automatically receive the code for the ‘Free-on-Line Preview for this special feature.
Landscape – “Before Poussin to Today” in issue #5 of painters Tubes are delighted to include examples of contemporary landscapes from the work of the following artists (listed in first name alphabetical).
Alison Tyldesley – Arista Alanis – Bev Donahgue – Bruce Lyons – Chris Cyprus – Colin Taylor – Colin Haliday – Dave Bez – David Evans – Diane Terry – Dean Entwistle – Harry Roberston – Ian Norris – Jake Attree – Laurence Cause- Parsley – Martin Yeoman – Phil Ashley – Russel Howarth – Steve Capper – Ron Coleman.
Please Register to read free on line on our new dedicated platform by emailing email@example.com – Type ‘register me’ in the subject line Or go to painters tubes facebook page, like the page and message us. click/tap here
PRINTED VERSION – To reserve your copy of the printed version email firstname.lastname@example.org for a single copy or multiple copies. Please state preferred number of copies – Cost only £10 delivered to your door (£8 + £2 p&p – UK only) Please ask for a guide for posting cost outside the UK stating the country you wish the copy posted to.
the best content magazine that is Free to Read on line. No sign up required
Read painters TUBES for FREE – No Sign up and No Adverts